| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
» July 2009 (0)
» June 2009 (13)
» May 2009 (8)
» April 2009 (12)
» March 2009 (14)
» February 2009 (9)
» January 2009 (21)
» December 2008 (13)
» November 2008 (16)
» October 2008 (13)
» September 2008 (19)
» August 2008 (14)
» July 2008 (14)

Amnesty International's new viral waterboarding film balances shock with hope. And a soft ask.
Do charities who took donations from fraudster Bernard Madoff have a moral obligation to return the money?
On a day that even the Iranian uprising has been relegated to the inside pages of high-end newspapers, it's important to remember those stories that get lost in the news cycle.
I have been known to say out loud that I think charities don't always capitalise on current affairs as well as they might, so today I would like to hail the British Heart Foundation.
Hats off to Save the Children for giving Mary Portas the chance to try and transform one of its failing charity shops into retail nirvana.
The tactics employed by an Australian charity on the brink of a financial crisis helped treble their appeal from the same time last year.
Charities need to differentiate themselves from pushy salespeople whose only interest is in a short-term sale
Retail expert Mary Portas has revamped a Save The Children charity shop in Kent, transforming its fortunes but upsetting a few volunteers along the way. So who's right?
Ah, finally the Great Cabinet Reshuffle hits our humble sector. I was starting to feel that civil society organisations were not important enough to warrant a stop in the ministerial musical chairs.
I'm starting to think that the recession is actually good for charities. A decade of growth has left us fat and unfocussed. Now everyone is taking a long hard look at how they use their time and re-rationalising what is effective.
I believe the constant pressure for charities to merge is misguided and has the potential to damage public support. Let me explain why.
When a Christian charity can get its supporters vandalising public property in promotion of the cause, you know they've got it.
With summer well and truly here, love it or hate it, street fundraising works best in the sunny season, so agencies and in-house teams will be maximising the number of fundraisers on the street.
The winners of the 2009 Professional Fundraising Awards will be revealed in next month's magazine, but in the meantime we thought we might tickle you with what our judges thought.
While excitement about the new communication mediums the internet allows for charities is understandable, the humble 'old' email is often neglected. But emails are a great vehicle to tell a story, if not engage in a conversation, and charities can make more of them.
Slapping ‘for charity' at the end of a phrase has a power akin to suffixing ‘in bed' to newspaper headlines.
But will offers torture people for charity ever catch on?
At a recent conference in Ottawa, Canada I couldn't help but notice that the session focussing on on-line fundraising was packed to the rafters, not an uncommon occurance as delegates flock to these type of sessions.
It was at this moment though, that the penny finally dropped for me...
A fundraising video for a school in California uses celebrities to encourage people not to give to their cause. Reverse psychology or a disaster: what do you think?
I have been wanting to write this blog for a couple of weeks now, but thought it only courteous to wait until the final entrant finished the marathon.
American super-retailer Target has taken to Facebook to help it allocate $3m to charity by the end of this month.